COLUMNISTS
The Indian Express
Sunday, March 12, 2006
 
 
 
  SEARCH IE
  IE ARCHIVE
   Search by Date
  SERVICES
 
  Free Money Transfers to India
  Matrimonials
  New friendships, romance...
  Send Gifts Online New
  Express Travel
  Personalised Predictions
  GROUP SITES
 
  Expressindia
  The Indian Express
  The Financial Express
  Screen
  City Newslines
  Kashmir Live
  Latest News
  Express Cricket
  Loksatta
  Lokprabha
  Express Computer
  North American
Edition [Print]
  CHANNELS
 
  Astrology
  Shopping
  Express Classifieds
  Express Estates
  Express Money
  Express Travel
  SUBSCRIPTIONS
 
  Free Newsletter
  Wireless Express
  SYNDICATIONS
 
  RSS Feeds
 
Select Columnists
 
INSIDE TRACK
Jaya: the sole exception
 
Mail this story
Print this story
The clause in the Prevention of Disqualification Act under which Jaya Bachchan may lose her seat in the Rajya Sabha for holding an office of profit with the government has been flouted with impunity by numerous parliamentarians in the past. No MP was, however, penalised since the Act permits Parliament to condone the violation and remove the disqualification with retrospective effect. It also gives Parliament the discretion to exempt any office from disqualification.

The list of government positions for which an exception has been made has steadily grown over the years. It includes membership of the minorities and scheduled caste commissions as well as the National Commission on Women. Members of the Waqf Board, the Press Council of India, the coffee, tea and spices boards as well as the NCC and the Territorial Army are also exempt. So too are sheriffs of major cities and MPs appointed member of a mission sent out of India or appointed to a temporary committee.

 
Send your comments to the columnist
Name
Your E-Mail
Your Comments
 
The move to disqualify Bachchan for being a member of the UP Film Development Council (UPFDC) seems in the above context to be petty and vindictive. A chivalrous and friendly Parliament which has made so many exceptions in the past can let Jaya off the hook, particularly as the UP Assembly had already deemed membership of the UPFDC not an office of profit.

Turned down earlier

Justice U C Banerjee, who was handpicked by Lalu Prasad Yadav to re-examine the Godhra coach fire even though an inquiry was already on by the Nanavati Commission, was earlier turned down for appointment as chairman of the Advanced Ruling Authority on Customs and Excise. Justice G B Pattanaik, as Chief Justice of India, had forwarded Banerjee’s name for the post, but the Finance Ministry had raised objections. Consequently, Banerjee’s name was withdrawn by Pattanaik’s successor Chief Justice V N Khare.

Kept in the dark

A senior official of the Election Commission informed an election commissioner that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh hoped to be in Kerala and Tamil Nadu between March 4 and 6 and hinted that the election schedule should be announced only after the PM’s visit. The commissioner did not commit himself. On March 2, the Commission announced the schedule for elections to the five states where assembly elections are to be held, putting paid to Manmohan Singh’s visit, where the PM was expected to announce some populist schemes. Similarly Transport Minister T R Baalu had to shelve his plan to lay the foundation stones for some new roads in Tamil Nadu.

The Election Commission maintained such secrecy about the assembly poll schedule that until the dates were announced at a press conference, even its own officials were in the dark.

Constant gardener has left

The splendour of the garden at 28 Akbar Road, occupied by Bihar leader Satyendra Narain Sinha and his family for some 30 years, was legendary. The garden invariably won awards at all Delhi’s flower shows. The bungalow was first allotted to Sinha when he was an MP and later to his wife. After that it was transferred to Delhi Police and allotted to Sinha’s son Nikhil Kumar as police commissioner. Then the house returned to the MPs’ quota and was in the name of Nikhil’s wife Shyama Sinha, who by then had been elected to Parliament from the family pocketborough of Aurangabad in Bihar.

Unfortunately, the showpiece garden aroused quite a bit of envy. Several MPs staked a claim for the bungalow the moment Parliament was dissolved in 2004 on the ground that Shyama Sinha was not entitled to retain the house since she was not standing for re-election. Deputy Speaker of the Lok Sabha Charanjit Singh Atwal pulled rank and claimed the house. But when he examined the house from inside, his enthusiasm waned. The actual bungalow had been partitioned into two. The house is now with K Rahman Khan, Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha. The garden has wilted away and the lawn is unkempt.

Gardens after all require a lot of work. It is not clear why the government was in such an unseemly haste to get the house vacated as Nikhil Kumar was elected to the Lok Sabha from the same constituency as his wife that year on a Congress ticket, and some leeway is normally given in such circumstances. As a result, Delhi has lost one of its landmark gardens.

Deputing work to deputies

Unlike most jobless ministers of state, the two junior ministers in defence are grateful to their senior Pranab Mukherjee for giving them work. Two days after the January 29 ministerial expansion, Mukherjee passed an order delegating responsibilities to both his two new ministers of state. Rao Inderjit Singh has been given charge of Defence Production as well as various service matters. M M Pallamraju is responsible for the welfare and resettlement of ex-servicemen, the Himalayan mountaineering institutes and the defence appeal committees for pensions. He is also on the board of governors of all Sainik and senior Kendriya Vidyalaya schools.

Eloquent silence

All major political parties took very public positions on President George Bush’s visit to India and the nuclear deal. Even former prime minister V P Singh put out a statement urging India to abstain from the vote on the IAEA. The only exception was the BSP, which made no comment on either the American President’s visit or the nuclear deal. The BSP’s silence is significant. The party claims it was preoccupied with recent developments in UP, but perhaps it does not want to alienate either minority voters or the upper caste Hindu voters by adding to the cacophony on the issue.

 
Mail this story
Print this story
Select Columnists
 


Recent columns by Coomi Kapoor
Calculating the cost 05.03.06
Riding the anti-Bush wave 04.03.06
Chatwal: all chatter, no wail 26.02.06
Falling in line 19.02.06
Wings further clipped 12.02.06
 
 
Go to Today's Edition  
For Columns between October 1999 to April 2002
   
 
 

People who read this Column also read
Chatwal: all chatter, no wail
Falling in line
Wings further clipped
Dousing Bush fire
Apply, apply, no reply
Full Coverage
Varanasi Blasts
Assembly Poll '06
The Bush Visit; March '06
Budget 2006-07
India-England Series
Rail Budget, 2006- 07
Bird Flu
India in Pakistan: 2006
Bofors Scam
Building house beaking Law
Bringing Back Bihar
Oil For Food Scandal: The Natwar Cloud
Manjunath S: Death on Duty
Killer Waves Hit India
Mumbai Blasts
Army's Muslim headcount
India Empowered
Kashmir Quake
Delhi Blasts
Chappell vs Ganguly
View from the Left
Chandigarh War Memorial
Missing Tigers
Defence Deals: What The CVC Found
Bihar Flood Scam
Cities And Their People
Karthikeyan: Driving India Forward
Budget 2005-06
Ambani Empire Divided
Bangalore Crumbling
Gujarat Riots
Dubey Murder
Walk the Talk
Travelogues
Petrol Pump Scam
Stamp of Shame
Cash on Camera
India-Pak Faceoff
Firing Line
   
 
   
About Us | Advertise With Us | Privacy Policy |
   
© 2005: Indian Express Newspapers (Mumbai) Ltd. All rights reserved throughout the world.